Articles

Ex situ study of Enterococcus faecalis survival in the recreational waters of the southern coast of the Caspian Sea

Abstract

Background and objectives: The USEPA has suggested faecal enterococci as the primary bacterial indicators. Of more importance is their direct correlation with swimmer-associated gastroenteritis in recreation water quality monitoring. In contrast to other seawater bodies with 3.5% salinity, the recreational waters in the southern coast of the Caspian Sea possess its own salinity (about 1% w/v) and thus require further investigations to determine the capacity of Enterococcus faecalis as the sole primary microbial index in this unique aquatic environment.
Materials and Methods: The survey of the presence and survival of E. faecalis as a microbial index in the recreational waters of the southern Caspian Sea was carried out using a microcosm as an experimental model. The concentration of E. faecalis cells in samples of seawater were estimated by a standard membrane filtration method using m-Enterococcus agar as the selective culture medium. As the current standard culture-based methods are not reliable enough for the detection of non-growing, damaged and under-tension bacteria, PCR was used to identify the possible VBNC form of the bacterium after disappearing of the culturable cells.
Results and Conclusion: A continuous decline in the number of culturable E. faecalis cells resulted in apparent elimination of the bacteria from seawater in a defined period. Detection of intact DNA was possible in the following 60 days. The salinity of about 1% and the self-purification properties of the Caspian Sea make the conditions feasible for the use of this microorganism as a measure of water quality throughout the region. The results confirmed the presence of damaged bacterial cells, namely VBNC forms, indicating the necessity of examining of the sea water samples by using molecular approaches or repair procedures.

Pourcher AM, Devriese LA, Hernandez JF, Delattre LM. Enumeration by a miniaturized method of Esch- erichia coli, Streptococcus bovis and enterococci as indicators of the origin of fecal pollution of waters. J Appl Bacteriol 1991; 70: 525-530.

Devriese LA, Laurier L, De-Herdt P, Haesebrouck F.Enterococcal and Streptococcal species isolated from feces of calves young cattle and dairy cows. J Appl Bacteriol 1992; 72: 29-31.

Messer JW, Dufour AP. A rapid, specific membrane filtration procedure for enumeration of enterococci in recreational water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:678-680.

US Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Method 1600: enterococci in water by membrane filtration us- ing membrane Enterococcus indoxyl-Dglucoside agar (mEI). EPA 821/R02/022. Washington DC, US. Envi- ronmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

Baums IB, Goodwin KD, Kiesling T, Wanless D, Diaz MR, Fell JW. Luminex detection of fecal indicators in river samples, marine recreational water and beach sand. Mar Pollut Bull 2007; 54: 521-536.

Flahaut S, Frere J, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. Compar- ison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress response in Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62: 2416-2420.

Environmental Protection Agency (1986). Ambient Wa- ter Quality Criteria for Bacteria. EPA/440/5-84/002. Washington DC, United States Environmental Protec- tion Agency, Office of Water.

Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Bacterial wa- ter quality standards for recreational waters (fresh and marine). Washington DC, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Regulations and Standards Division, pp.18.

Lieo MM, Tafi MC, Canepari P. Non-culturable Entero- coccus faecalis cells are metabolically active and ca- pable of resuming active growth. Syst Appl Microbiol 1998; 21: 333-339.

Lieo MM, Tafi MC, Signoretto C, Dal Cero C, Canepa- ri P. Competitive polymerase chain reaction for quan- tification of nonculturable Enterococcus faecalis cells in lake water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1999; 30: 345-353.

Colwell RR (2000). Bacterial death revisited. In: Non- culturable microorganisms in the environment. Ed, Colwell and Grimes. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp.325-342.

Leser TD, Boye M, Hendriksen NB. Survival and ac- tivity of Pseudomonas sp. strain B13 (FR1) in a marine microcosm determined by quantitative PCR and an rRNA-targeting probe and its effect on the indigenous bacterial plankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:1201-1207.

Signoretto C, Burlacchini G, Pruzzo C, Canepari P.Persistence of Enterococcus faecalis in aquatic envi- ronments via surface interactions with copepods. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 71: 2756-2761.

Steen E, Eie T. The effect of resuscitation and the in- cubation temperature on recovery of uninjured, heat injured and freeze injured enterococci. Int J Food Mi- crobiol 1992; 15: 177-184.

Lieo MM, Bonato B, Tafi MC, Signoretto C, Pruzzoand C, Canepari P. Molecular vs. culture methods for the detection of bacterial fecal indicators in ground water for human use. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005; 40: 289-294.

Richard AH, Shawn CS, Larry JW, Kristen PB, Alfred DP. Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in fresh water at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. Water Res 2005; 39:559-568.

Signoretto C, Boaretti M, Canepari P. Cloning, sequenc-ing and expression in Escherichia coli of the low-affin- ity penicillin-binding protein of Enterococcus faecalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1994; 123: 99-106.

Manero A, Blanch A. Identification of Enterococcus spp. with a biochemical key. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 4425-4430.

Lieo MM, Bonato B, Benedetti D, Canepari P. Survival of enterococcal species in aquatic environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2005; 54:189-196.

Morita RY (1992). Low-nutrient environments. In: En- cyclopedia of Microbiology. Ed, Lederberg. CA: Aca- demic Press, Inc. San Diego, pp. 617-624.

Lieo MM, Bonato B, Tafi MC, Signoretto C, Boaretti M, Canepari P. Resuscitation rate in different Entero- coccal species in the viable but non-culturable state. J Appl Microbiol 2001; 91: 1095-1102.

Zimmerman AM, Rebarchik DM, Flowers AR, Wil- liams JL, Grimes DJ. Escherichia coli detection us- ing mTEC agar and fluorescent antibody direct viable counting on coastal recreational water samples. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009; 49: 478-483.

Barer MR, Harwood CR. Bacterial viability and cultur- ability. Adv Microb Physiol 1999; 41: 93-137.

Toranzos GA, McFetters GA (1997). Detection of in- dicator microorganisms in environmental freshwater sand drinking waters. In: Manual of Environmental Microbiology. Ed, CJ Kurst,GR Knudsen, MJ McIn- nerney, LD Stetzenbach and MV Walter.ASM Press, Washington DC, pp. 184-194.

Colwell RR, Huq H (1994). Vibrios in the environment: viable but nonculturable Vibrio cholerae. In: Vibrio- cholerae and Cholera: Molecular Global Perspectives. Ed, T Kaye. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp. 117-133.

Leclerc H, Devriese LA, Mossel DA. Taxonomical changes in intestinal (fecal) enterococci and strepto- cocci: consequences on their use as indicators of fe- cal contamination in drinking water. J Appl Bacteriol 1996; 81: 459-466.

Boehm AB. Sassoubre LM. 2014. Enterococci as in- dicators of environmental fecal contamination. In: The Enterococci. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK190421/

Muruleedhara NB, Meredith BN, Asja K, Zachery RS, Valerie JH. Enterococci in the environment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2012; 76(4): 685–706.

Mote BL, Turner JW, Lipp EK. Persistence and growth of the fecal indicator bacteria enterococci in detritus and natural estuarine plankton communities. Appl En- viron Microbiol 2012;78:2569-2577.

Files
IssueVol 8 No 2 (2016) QRcode
SectionArticles
Keywords
Caspian Sea experimental modeling microbial indices molecular methods Enterococcus faecalis

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Irankhah S, Soudi MR, Gharavi S. Ex situ study of Enterococcus faecalis survival in the recreational waters of the southern coast of the Caspian Sea. Iran J Microbiol. 2016;8(2):101-107.