Efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail in controlling Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Salmonella Enteritidis is widespread in the world and is known to be among the most common agents of zoonotic food-borne illnesses. This study evaluates the efficacy of a bacteriophage cocktail — comprising SEPL01 (Siphovirus) and SEPL13 and SEPL20 (Myoviruses) — in controlling Salmonella Enteritidis infection in poultry.
Materials and Methods: A total of 168 one-day-old desi chicks were procured and randomly divided into five different groups: negative control, positive control, prophylactic, 6 h and delayed post-challenge treatment group. Birds in the positive control and trial groups were orally infected with 10⁵ CFU/ml S. Enteritidis on the fourth day. The bacteriophage was given in 10⁷ PFU/ml through oral gavage, drinkers and aerosol spray. Bacterial enumeration was done using dilution plate counting on XLD agar and bacterial reduction was determined using log10 reduction.
Results: Among the groups, the prophylactic group showed the highest log₁₀ bacterial reduction: 1.92 (Day 3), 1.79 (Day 7), and 1.23 (Day 14). Drinking water administration resulted in a log₁₀ reduction of 1.62, 1.44, and 0.91, respectively, while aerosol spray was the least effective with a log₁₀ reduction of 1.12, 0.85, and 0.52 across the same days. The treatment group receiving therapy 6 hours post-challenge exhibited a moderate level of reduction: 1.63, 1.37, and 1.22 via oral gavage; 1.43, 1.15, and 0.94 via drinkers; and 0.46, 0.15, and 0.12 via aerosol spray. The delayed post-challenge group showed smaller reductions: 1.56, 1.24, and 0.92 by oral gavage; 1.25, 0.99, and 0.79 by water; and 0.42, 0.13, and 0.10 by aerosol spray.
Conclusion: The bacteriophage therapy is highly effective in reducing Salmonella Enteritidis, demonstrating potential as an antibiotic alternative.
2. Raza H, Ali MA, Nawaz M, Ali MM, Mehmood A, Nasir J, et al. Evaluation of the combined effect of probiotic Lactobacillus gallinarum PL53 and organic acids on mitigation of Campylobacter jejuni infection in broilers. Egypt J Vet Sci 2026; 57: 1-8.
3. Li S, He Y, Mann DA, Deng X. Global spread of Salmonella Enteritidis via centralized sourcing and international trade of poultry breeding stocks. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 5109.
4. Seribelli AA, Cruz MF, Vilela FP, Frazão MR, Paziani MH, Almeida F, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates from humans and foods in Brazil. PLoS One 2020; 15(8): e0237886.
5. Shakir MZ, Rizvi F, Masoud F, Rafique A, Usmani MW, Naseem MN, et al. Seroprevalence, Molecular Confirmation and Application of Bacteriophage as A Potential Prophylactic Therapy Against Fowl Typhoid Disease in Commercial Poultry Birds. Pak Vet J 2024; 44: 1185-1192.
6. Ullah A, Shabil M, Abdulsamad SA, Jan A, Naeem AA, Ullah H, et al. Prevalence of the antibiotic resistance of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2025; 12(4): ofaf131.
7. Bäumler AJ, Tsolis RM, Ficht TA, Adams LG. Evolution of host adaptation in Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 4579-4587.
8. El-Saadony MT, Salem HM, El-Tahan AM, Abd El-Mageed TA, Soliman SM, Khafaga AF, et al. The control of poultry salmonellosis using organic agents: an updated overview. Poult Sci 2022; 101: 101716.
9. Durrani RH, Sheikh AA, Humza M, Ashraf S, Kokab A, Mahmood T, et al. Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Profile and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index in Avian Adapted Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum Isolates. Pak Vet J 2024; 44. DOI: 10.29261/pakvetj/2024.253
10. Muaz K, Riaz M, Akhtar S, Park S, Ismail A. Antibiotic residues in chicken meat: global prevalence, threats, and decontamination strategies: a review. J Food Prot 2018; 81: 619-627.
11. Principi N, Silvestri E, Esposito S. Advantages and limitations of bacteriophages for the treatment of bacterial infections. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10: 513.
12. Morrisette T, Kebriaei R, Lev KL, Morales S, Rybak MJ. Bacteriophage Therapeutics: a primer for clinicians on phage-antibiotic combinations. Pharmacotherapy 2020; 40: 153-168.
13. Costa MJ, Pastrana LM, Teixeira JA, Sillankorva SM, Cerqueira MA. Bacteriophage Delivery Systems for Food Applications: Opportunities and Perspectives. Viruses 2023; 15: 1271.
14. Amin MT, Usman M, Ishaq HM, Ali A, Tariq M, Saleem MM, et al. Comparative evaluation of management practices among large-scale broiler farms of Punjab, Pakistan. Heliyon 2025; 11(3): e42381.
15. Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M, et al. Salmonella control in poultry flocks and its public health impact. EFSA J 2019; 17(2): e05596.
16. Kokab A, Shekh A, Rabbani M, Shehzad W, Riaz MI, Qurat Ul Ain. Post-harvest biocontrol of Salmonella Enteritidis on Chicken breast meat and Shell eggs using multiphage cocktail. Vet Ital 2023; 59. doi: 10.12834/VetIt.2975.19320.1.
17. Durrani RH, Sheikh AA, Rabbani M, Khan MU, Riaz MI, Naeem MA, et al. Physiological properties of indigenous lytic bacteriophages as monophage suspension and cocktail against poultry-adapted typhoidal Salmonella variants. Vet Res Forum 2022; 13: 481-487.
18. Lorenzo-Rebenaque L, Malik DJ, Catalá-Gregori P, Marin C, Sevilla-Navarro S. In Vitro and In Vivo Gastrointestinal Survival of Non-Encapsulated and Microencapsulated Salmonella Bacteriophages: Implications for Bacteriophage Therapy in Poultry. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14: 434.
19. Park SH, Ryu S, Kang DH. Development of an improved selective and differential medium for isolation of Salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 3222-3226.
20. Singh V, Rana RK, Singhal R. Analysis of repeated measurement data in the clinical trials. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2013; 4: 77-81.
21. Ahmadi M, Karimi Torshizi MA , Rahimi S, Dennehy JJ. Prophylactic bacteriophage administration more effective than post-infection administration in reducing Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis shedding in quail. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 1253.
22. Kim S, Kim SH, Rahman M, Kim J. Characterization of a Salmonella Enteritidis bacteriophage showing broad lytic activity against Gram-negative enteric bacteria. J Microbiol 2018; 56: 917-925.
23. Ryan EM, Gorman SP, Donnelly RF, Gilmore BF. Recent advances in bacteriophage therapy: how delivery routes, formulation, concentration and timing influence the success of phage therapy. J Pharm Pharmacol 2011; 63: 1253-1264.
24. Carvalho CM, Gannon BW, Halfhide DE, Santos SB, Hayes CM, Roe JM, et al. The in vivo efficacy of two administration routes of a phage cocktail to reduce numbers of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in chickens. BMC Microbiol 2010; 10: 232.
25. Wernicki A, Nowaczek A, Urban-Chmiel R. Bacteriophage therapy to combat bacterial infections in poultry. Virol J 2017; 14: 179.
26. Palma M, Qi B. Advancing Phage Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of the Safety, Efficacy, and Future Prospects for the Targeted Treatment of Bacterial Infections. Infect Dis Rep 2024; 16: 1127-1181.
27. Bardina C, Spricigo DA, Cortés P, Llagostera M. Significance of the bacteriophage treatment schedule in reducing Salmonella colonization of poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78: 6600-6607.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 18 No 3 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v18i3.21658 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Bacteriophage therapy Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis Drug resistance Microbials Zoonoses | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |



