Articles

Comparison of five diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Invasive and non-invasive techniques are used to diagnose H. pylori infection. Some factors influence the choice of a diagnostic test, such as the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, the clinical circumstances and the cost-effectiveness of the testing strategy. The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between different H. pylori infection diagnosis methods, and clarify the application scope of each diagnosis method.
Materials and Methods: 91 patients were included in the study, and specimens including biopsies, blood and stool were taken. Biopsies were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin, and Giemsa staining. A sequence of 294 bp in the ureC (glmM) gene was amplified. The rapid urease test (RUT) was performed using a non-commercial validated test. Stool samples were analyzed using a polyclonal ELISA stool antigen test. A serological assay for IgG antibodies was performed by a commercial Helicobacter pylori IgG ELISA kit.
Results: According to the predefined criteria, a total of 46 (50.5%) patients tested were positive by at least 2 of the 3 biopsy- based methods. The best sensitivity (95.6%) belonged to histology and RUT. The sensitivities of other tests including PCR, serology and stool antigen test were 93.5%, 91.3% and 73.9%, respectively. RUT showed the best specificity (100%), and the specificities of the other tests, including PCR, stool antigen test, histology and serology, were 95.6%, 86.7%, 77.8% and 55.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: In view of the better results obtained for invasive vs. non-invasive tests, for a more accurate diagnosis, it is advisable not to solely rely on non-invasive methods of H. Pylori diagnosis.

Demiray E, Yilmaz O, Sarkis C, Soyturk M, Simsek I. Comparison of invasive methods and two different stool antigen tests for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in patients with gastric bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 4206-4210.

Kabir S. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in faeces by culture, PCR and enzyme immunoassay. J Med Microbiol 2001; 50: 1021-1029.

Dunn BE, Cohen H, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori.Clin Microbiol Rev 1997; 10: 720-741.

Allaker RP, Young KA, Hardie JM, Domizio P, Meadows NJ. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori at oral and gastrointestinal sites in children: evidence for possible oral-to-oral transmission. J Med Microbiol 2002; 51: 312-317.

Peng NJ, Lai KH, Lo GH, Hsu PI. Comparison of noninvasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. Med Princ Pract 2009; 18: 57-61.

Shukla SK, Prasad KN, Tripathi A, Ghoshal UC, Krishnani N, Nuzhat H. Quantitation of Helicobacter pylori ureC gene and its comparison with different diagnostic techniques and gastric histopathology. J Microbiol Methods 2011; 86: 231-237.

Hachem CY, Clarridge JE, Evans DG, Graham DY.Comparison of agar based media for primary isolation of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Pathol 1995; 48: 714-716.

Mobley HL, Hu LT, Foxal PA. Helicobacter pylori urease: properties and role in pathogenesis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1991; 187: 39-46.

Lee JM, Breslin NP, Fallon C, O’Morain CA. Rapid urease tests lack sensitivity in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis when peptic ulcer disease presents with bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1166-1170.

Graham DY, Adam E, Reddy GT, Agarwal JP, Agarwal R, Evans DJ, Jr., et al. Seroepidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in India. Comparison of developing and developed countries. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36: 1084-1088.

Osaki T, Mabe K, Hanawa T, Kamiya S. Urease-positive bacteria in the stomach induce a false-positive reaction in a urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57(Pt 7): 814-819.

Pourakbari B, Mirsalehian A, Maleknejad P, Mamishi S, Azhdarkosh H, Daryani NE, et al. Evaluation of a new antigen for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in stool of adult and children. Helicobacter 2011; 16: 42-46.

Lu JJ, Perng CL, Shyu RY, Chen CH, Lou Q, Chong SK,et al. Comparison of five PCR methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in gastric tissues. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 772-774.

Choi J, Kim CH, Kim D, Chung SJ, Song JH, Kang JM, et al. Prospective evaluation of a new stool antigen test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, rapid urease test, (13) C-urea breath test, and serology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 1053-1059.

McNulty CA, Lehours P, Megraud F. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Helicobacter 2011; 16 Suppl 1: 10-8.

Megraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20: 280-322.

el-Zimaity HM, Graham DY, al-Assi MT, Malaty H, Karttunen TJ, Graham DP, et al. Interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Hum Pathol 1996; 27: 35-41.

Christensen AH, Gjorup T, Hilden J, Fenger C, Henriksen B, Vyberg M, et al. Observer omogeneity in the histologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Latent class analysis, kappa coefficient, and repeat frequency. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27: 933-939.

de Martel C, Plummer M, van Doorn LJ, Vivas J, Lopez G, Carillo E, et al. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and histopathology for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsies. Int J Cancer 2010; 126: 1992-1996.

Mendoza-Ibarra SI, Perez-Perez GI, Bosques-Padilla FJ, Urquidi-Rivera M, Rodriguez-Esquivel Z, Garza- Gonzalez E. Utility of diagnostic tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori in children in northeastern Mexico. Pediatr Int 2007; 49: 869-874.

Taj Y, Essa F, Kazmi SU, Abdullah E. Sensitivity, specificity of various diagnostic tests in the detection of Helicobacter pylori. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2003;13: 90-93.

Aguilar-Soto O, Majalca-Martnez C, Leon-Espinosa F, Avila-Vargas G, Sanchez-Medina R, Figueroa SA, et al. Comparative study between rapid urease test, imprint, histopathological study for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004; 69: 136-142.

Lage AP, Godfroid E, Fauconnier A, Burette A, Butzler JP, Bollen A, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by PCR: comparison with other invasive techniques, detection of cagA gene in gastric biopsy specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 2752-2756.

Cutler AF, Prasad VM, Santogade P. Four-year trends in Helicobacter pylori IgG serology following successful eradication. Am J Med 1998; 105: 18-20.

Koletzko S. Noninvasive diagnostic tests for Helico- bacter pylori infection in children. Can J Gastroenterol 2005; 19: 433-439.

Krogfelt KA, Lehours P, Megraud F. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Helicobacter 2005; 10 Suppl 1: 5-13.

Vaira D, Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, Axon AT, Deltenre M, Hirschl AM, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection with a new non-invasive antigen-based assay.HpSA European study group. Lancet 1999; 354(9172):30-33.

Trevisani L, Sartori S, Ruina M, Caselli M, Rossi MR, Costa F, et al. Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test: clinical evaluation, cost analysis of a new enzyme immunoassay. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44: 2303-2306.

Forne M, Dominguez J, Fernandez-Banares F, Lite J, Esteve M, Gali N, et al. Accuracy of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens in the diagnosis of infection, posttreatment check-up. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:2200-2205.

Trevisani L, Sartori S, Galvani F, Rossi MR, Ruina M, Chiamenti C, et al. Evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for detecting Helicobacter pylori in feces: a prospective pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:1830-1833.

Razaghi M, Seyyed Mehdi B, Ali M, Shirin N, Masoumeh H, Mehrdad J. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by ELISA stool antigen, comparison with the other diagnostic methods. Health MED 2010;4: 545-551.

Makristathis A, Barousch W, Pasching E, Binder C, Kuderna C, Apfalter P, et al. Two enzyme immunoassays, PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens from pediatric patients before, after eradication therapy. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:3710-3714.

Erzin Y, Altun S, Dobrucali A, Aslan M, Erdamar S, Dirican A, et al. Comparison of two different stool antigen tests for the primary diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in turkish patients with dyspepsia. Helicobacter 2004; 9: 657-662.

Files
IssueVol 5 No 4 (2013) QRcode
SectionArticles
Keywords
ELISA Helicobacter pylori Histopathology PCR RUT S tool antigen test

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Khalifehgholi M, Shamsipour F, Ajhdarkosh H, Ebrahimi Daryani N, Pourmand M-R, Hosseini M, Ghasemi A, Shirazi M-H. Comparison of five diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori. Iran J Microbiol. 1;5(4):396-401.