Articles

Evaluation of adhesive and anti-adhesive properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and their inhibition by herbal plants

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Adhesion and colonization are prerequisites for the establishment of bacterial pathogenesis. The biofilm development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was assessed on adhesive surfaces like dialysis membrane, stainless steel, glass and polystyrene.
Materials and Methods: Microtiter plate biofilm assay was performed to assess the effect of nutrient medium and growth parameters of P. aeruginosa. Further, its growth on adhesive surfaces namely hydrophilic (dialysis membrane) and hydrophobic (polystyrene plate, square glass and stainless steel coupon) was assessed. The exopolysaccharide (EPS) was quantified using ruthenium red microplate assay and microscopic analysis was used to observe P. aeruginosa biofilm architecture. The anti-biofilm activity of herbal extracts on mature P. aeruginosa was performed.
Results: The formation of large scale biofilms on dialysis membrane for 72 h was proved to be the best surface. In microscopic studies, very few exopolysaccaride fibrils, indicating a rather loose matrix was observed at 48 h. Further, thick exopolysaccaride, indicated higher adhesive properties at 72 h which is evident from ruthenium red staining. Among the plant extract used, Justicia wynaadensis leaf and Aristolochia indica (Eswari) root extract showed significant reduction of anti-biofilm activity of 0.178 OD and 0.192 OD in inhibiting mature biofilms at 0.225 OD respectively, suggesting the possible use of these extracts as efficient anti-adhesive and biofilm-disrupting agents with potential applications in controlling biofilms on surfaces.
Conclusion: Our study facilitates better understanding in the development of P. aeruginosa biofilms on different food processing and clinical surfaces ultimately taking care of food safety and hygiene.

Zameer F, Gopal S, Krohne G, Kreft J. Development of a biofilm model for Listeria monocytogenes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2009; 26: 1143-1147.

Smith AW. Biofilms and antibiotic therapy: is there a role for combating bacterial resistance by the use of novel drug delivery systems? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005; 57: 1539-1550.

Drenkard E, Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas biofilm for- mation and antibiotic resistance are linked to pheno- typic variation. Nature 2002; 416: 740-743.

Chmielewsky RAN, Frank JF. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2003; 2: 22-32.

Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB. Establisment of Pseu- domonas aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist. Microbes Infect 2000; 2: 1051-1060.

Stover C K, Pham XQ, Erwin AL. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an op- portunistic pathogen. Nature 2000; 406: 959-964.

Van Houdt R, Michiels CW. Biofilm formation and the food industry, a focus on the bacterial outer surface. J Appl Microbiol 2010; 109: 1117-31.

Parsek MR, Fuqua C. Biofilms 2003: emerging themes and challenges in studies of surface-associated micro- bial life. J Bacteriol 2004; 186: 4427-4440.

Djordjevic D, Wiedmann M, McLandsborough LA.Microtiter plate assay for assessment of Listeria mono- cytogenes biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68: 2950-2958.

Kalmokoff ML, Austin JW, Wan XD, Sanders G, Ba- nerjee S, Farber JM. Adsorption, attachment and bio- film formation among isolates of Listeria monocyto- genes using model conditions. J Appl Microbiol 2001;91: 725-734.

Meghashri S, Vijay Kumar H, Gopal S. Antioxidant properties of a novel flavonoid from leaves of L. as- pera. Food Chem 2010; 122: 105-110.

Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Med 1998; 64:711-3.

Vanhaecke E, Remon JP, Moors M, Raes F, De Rudder D, Van Peteghem A. kinetics of Pseudomonas aerugi- nosa adhesion to 304 and 316-L stainless steel: role of cell surface hydrophobicity. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990; 56:788-95.

Fletcher M, Marshall KC. Bubble contact angle meth- od for evaluating substratum interfacial characteristics and its relevance to bacterial attachment. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44: 184-192.

Marshall KC, Stout R, Mitchell R. Mechanism of the initial events in the sorption of marine bacteria to sur- faces. J Gen Microbiol 1971; 68: 337-348.

Stanley PM. Factors affecting the irreversible attach- ment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to stainless steel. Can J Microbiol 1983; 29: 1493-1499.

Zameer F, Kreft J, Gopal S. Interaction of the dual spe- cies biofilms of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylo- coccus epidermidis. J Food Saf 2010; 30: 954-968.

Borges A, Saavedra MJ, Simões M. The activity of fe- rulic and gallic acids in biofilm prevention and control of pathogenic bacteria. Biofouling 2012; 28:755-767.

Plyuta V, Zaitseva J, Lobakova E, Zagoskina N, Kuznetsov A, Khmel I. Effect of plant phenolic com- pounds on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aerugi- nosa. APMIS 2013; 121:1073-1081.

Kim Y, Lee J, Kim S, Baek K, Lee J. Cinnamon bark oil and its components inhibit biofilm formation and toxin production. Int J Food Microbiol 2015 16; 195C: 30-39.

Kim HS, Lee SH, Byun Y, Park HD. 6-Gingerol re- duces Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence via quorum sensing inhibition. Sci Rep 2015;5: 8656-8667.

Files
IssueVol 8 No 2 (2016) QRcode
SectionArticles
Keywords
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Anti-biofilm Exopolysaccaride Anti-quromones

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Zameer F, MS R, Bala Chauhan J, Ara-Khanum S, Kumar P, Tripurasundari Devi A, Prasad MN N, BL D. Evaluation of adhesive and anti-adhesive properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and their inhibition by herbal plants. Iran J Microbiol. 2016;8(2):108-119.