<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Iranian Journal of Microbiology">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Microbiology</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-3289</Issn>
      <Volume>14</Volume>
      <Issue>5</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>22</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Genomic analysis of Fosfomycin resistance in multi-drug resistant uropathogens and comparison of in-vitro susceptibility methods uropathogens</title>
    <FirstPage>636</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>644</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Raunak</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bir</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sarita</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mohapatra</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Arvind</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kumar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nazneen</FirstName>
        <LastName>Arif</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sonu</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tyagi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Aswin</FirstName>
        <LastName>AK</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hitender</FirstName>
        <LastName>Gautam</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seema</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sood</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Bimal</FirstName>
        <LastName>Das</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Arti</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kapil</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>02</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background and Objectives: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common bacterial infections causing high morbidity and mortality. The alarming rise of multidrug-resistant uropathogens worldwide forced the clinician to rethink the old drugs like Fosfomycin for its therapeutic management. Our objective was to compare agar dilution, disc diffusion and E-test method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Fosfomycin against different drug-resistant uropathogens.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive 181 uropathogens were tested for Fosfomycin susceptibility using agar dilution, disc diffusion and E-test. Results were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. Whole genome sequencing analysis was done on the 4 XDR/PDR Fosfomycin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.
Results: Escherichia coli was found as the most common (62.4%) uropathogen followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (21%). Considering agar dilution as the gold standard, 6.1% of isolates were resistant to Fosfomycin. Following CLSI breakpoints, the susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, other Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 92.9%, 92.1%, 100%, 100%; whereas using EUCAST breakpoints the susceptibility rates were 85.7%, 86.9%, 92.9%, and 100%, respectively. The essential agreement, categorical agreement, major error, and very major error for E-test/ disc diffusion for all the organisms were 91.2%/Not Applicable, 95%/93.9%, 1.8%/4.7%, 9.1%/9.1%, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing showed mutation UhpT gene as well as the presence of plasmid-mediated fosA5 or fosA6 genes conferring Fosfomycin resistance.
Conclusion: This result supports very low resistance of Enterobacterales against Fosfomycin; hence should be considered a valuable option to treat multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Disc diffusion was observed to be a convenient method for Fosfomycin susceptibility testing compared to agar dilution.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijm/article/view/3500</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijm/article/download/3500/1500</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
