Iranian Journal of Microbiology 2018. 10(2):72-73.

The threat of colistin resistance among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Iran
Mehri Haeili, Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi

Abstract


Colistin belongs to polymyxin family of antibiotics which are polypeptide bactericidal agents acting mainly by disruption of outer-membrane in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). This antibiotic group (including polymyxin B and colistin) was approved for clinical use in the late 1950s but fell out of favour soon because of the reported high incidence of nephrotoxicity. With increasing the emergence of extensively-drug resistant (XDR)-GNB and paucity of new marketed antibiotics, polymyxins have recently regained significant clinical interest. They are currently considered as the last-line defense against problematic XDR-GNB notably carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Acinetobacter baumannii. Colistin revival in clinical settings has increased the inevitable risk of emerging resistance. Resistance to colistin in GNB is known to be mediated by chemical modification or complete loss of the antibiotic target, LPS. Recently the transmissible plasmid mediated resistance mechanism has been identified in Enterobacteriaceae posing a significant threat to infection control programs. Despite having a very similar chemical structure and indistinguishable antimicrobial activity in vitro, colistin and polymyxin B (PMB) differ mainly in the form administered parenterally. While PMB is administered directly as its active form, colistin is formulated as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) which itself lacks antibacterial activity and requires to be converted in vivo to colistin in a reaction which occurs slowly and incompletely. As a consequence, plasma concentrations of colistin rise slowly resulting in lower plasma concentrations in renally competent patients. Indeed, it is estimated that only <20%–25% of a dose of CMS is converted to active colistin in vivo (1). This is associated with reduced bacterial killing and may facilitate selection of colistin resistant mutants (1, 2). PMB on the other hand has superior clinical pharmacological properties over the CMS due to its rapid attainment of target concentrations, and may be a better therapeutic option for treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) (1, 3). PMB and CMS also differ in the way they are eliminated with the first is being mainly cleared by nonrenal pathway and the latter is eliminated predominantly by kidneys. Therefore, urinary concentrations of colistin exceed those that can be achieved with PMB, highlighting CMS as a better option for the treatment of urinary tract infections compared to PMB. Different countries vary in their access to parenteral formulation of CMS or PMB. In Iran, clinicians use CMS parenteral formulation for treatment of serious infections caused by XDR bacterial isolates most commonly A. baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. (Recently, we have encountered with outbreaks of different clones of colistin resistant carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (CR-KP) isolates at one of the largest hospitals of the country, Iran). The CR-KP stains were found to be isolated from different clinical samples including blood, tracheal aspirate, urine and wound and most of the patients from which CR-KP isolates were obtained characterized with BSIs. Assessing the molecular mechanisms of colistin resistance in the K. pneumoniae isolates showed that resistance was related to chromosomal mediated mechanisms but not plasmid encoded mcr genes. Indeed, genetic alterations in the mgrB gene including nonsense mutations and insertion of IS elements were found to be the major mechanisms mediating colistin resistance in these isolates (4). MgrB, a small transmembrane protein with 47 amino acids acts as the negative regulator of PhoP/PhoQ, a two-component regulatory system that regulates the expression of genes involved in LPS modifications and colistin resistance. Increased consumption of CMS in the hospital for treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase producing isolates of K. pneumoniae and also A. baumannii has probably provided the selective pressure for development of resistance to this agent. We have also previously demonstrated that repeated/long term colistin exposure is a great risk factor for emergence of colistin resistant mutants among A. baumannii isolates (5). Due to a high prevalence of CR-KP isolates in BSIs, it is hypothesized that administration of PMB for treatment of bloodstream infections may offer some benefits. Moreover, it has been described that conditions such as suboptimal dosing or prolonged monotherapy, are significantly associated with advent of colistin resistance. Therefore, clinicians should consider combination therapies containing polymyxins rather than colistin monotherapy for treatment of CRE infections. This approach improves clinical outcomes in critically ill patients and suggests favorable option for minimizing the emergence of polymyxin resistance. Likewise, tigecycline-based combination regimens containing colistin or other antibiotics for treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae have shown promising outcomes (6). Isolation of patients colonized or infected with colistin resistant strains are important for preventing patient-to-patient transmission in the hospital environment. Clinical microbiologists, infectious diseases specialists and clinical pharmacists should collaborate closely for a successful management of antimicrobial resistance at hospitals. Clinical microbiologists should actively participate in antimicrobial stewardship committees and providing therapy advice. However, the participation of clinical microbiologists in such programs is limited in some clinical settings and distancing of microbiology laboratories will make the situation even more complicated. At this moment, while we await the development of novel antibiotics with activity against the difficult-to-treat Gram-negative ‘superbugs’, we must also follow rational approaches to optimize the use and efficacy of older antibiotics including polymyxins. Also, more studies are required about the clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of polymyxins notably PMB, and factors that influence polymyxin activity, and development of resistance.


Keywords


No keywords###

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nation RL, Velkov T, Li J. Colistin and polymyxin B: peas in a pod, or chalk and cheese? Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:88-94.

Cheah S-E, Li J, Tsuji BT, Forrest A, Bulitta JB, Nation RL. Colistin and polymyxin B dosage regimens against Acinetobacter baumannii: differences in activity and the emergence of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:3921-3933.

Tran TB, Velkov T, Nation RL, Forrest A, Tsuji BT, Bergen PJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of colistin and polymyxin B: are we there yet? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016;48:592-597.

Haeili M, Javani A, Moradi J, Jafari Z, Feizabadi MM, Babaei E. MgrB alterations mediate colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Iran. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2470.

Haeili M, Kafshdouz M, Feizabadi MM. Molecular mechanisms of colistin resistance among pandrug-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with high case-fatality rate in intensive care unit patients. Microb Drug Resist 2018; doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0397. [Epub ahead of print].

Ah Y-M, Kim A-J, Lee J-Y. Colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrobial Agents 2014;44:8-15.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.